Sunday, November 06, 2016

Geology in Pop Culture - License Plate Geology #2

I had done this once before but I will continue as long as I can find some suitable examples. Here is my next in my License Plate Geology series: "Tuff"


Tuff
noun, Geology.
1. a fragmental rock consisting of the smaller kinds of volcanic detritus, as ash or cinder, usually more or less stratified. (dictionary.com)

Saturday, November 05, 2016

Random Geology Photo - Air Temperature Gradient on a Mountain Range

One of the things that I love most about the transition from fall to winter is the time of year when it is not cold enough for snow to fall in the valley but it will fall on the mountains as seen below. I had previously published a similar, although not quite as good (in my opinion), photo on this blog before.

The air temperature gradient as seen along the Oquirrh Mts in Utah.

As you move up in the atmosphere the temperature decreases. As described at onthesnow.com, this temperature gradient depends on the weather outside. On cloudy and snowy days the change in temperature is about 3.3°F per 1,000 ft in elevation or up to 5.4°F on sunny days. 


The best thing that I love about this picture is that it highlights the slope in the land. When you are driving out here you don't realize how much elevation gain there is driving south (the right side of the photo). As you can see the snow line meets the valley surface on the right (south) side of the image. The right (south) side is approximately 600-700 feet higher in elevation than the left (north) side of the image which runs into the Great Salt Lake (just off the picture to the left). The snow line then produces not only a topographic contour (line of equal elevation) but also a isotherm (a line of equal temperature). 


References
http://www.onthesnow.com/news/a/15157/does-elevation-affect-temperature-

Friday, November 04, 2016

GIS "Pro" Tips - Merging Rasters

Often in GIS you come across situations where you need to merge together rasters in order to have one file to work off of (Digital Elevation Models (DEMs), aerial images, etc.). I have found that it gets a bit tricky sometimes to merge those together and get everything to align properly and/or not have any issues. Below is a list of suggested guidelines to follow while merging together multiple rasters. This was started and expanded upon from advice by a co-worker while I was working my GIS job and I figured I would share it since I could never find anything on the internet that was as clear and concise.

Tool: In the search field type in “Mosaic to New Raster”

                 In the Mosaic to New Raster Tool:

Input rasters: Bring them in any order, doesn't matter.
Output location: Save them to a different folder from the one they're in.  It just seems to help thing from crashing. Assign it to the C Drive.
Raster Dataset name with extension: Short name (13 characters or less), no spaces.  Do not give it an extension.
Spatial reference: Blank. It'll revert to whatever the projection of the source rasters is, which is what you want.
Pixel Type: 32-bit float
Cellsize: Blank.  It'll default to the sources' cell size.
Number of Bands: 1
Mosaic operator: Last…unless they don't overlap and/or your data comes from multiple sources.
Mosaic Colormap Mode: Default.

The important part:
Click on the Environments button then click on Processing Extent. Pick one of your input rasters as your Snap Raster. This makes sure that your new cell edges match up with the original and that nothing shifts over.  This is real important with datasets that have large cell sizes, but you want your data to line up regardless.

This is one of those tools that doesn't work sometimes for no good reason.  If that happens, just try again.

When merging 2 overlapping rasters of different tile size

Sometimes you may want to combine rasters with two different tile sizes. This may be you have a DEM and you want to incorporate areas with higher resolution data like LiDAR within the DEM area. To do this within the Mosaic to New Raster tool:

  1. Give the LIDAR DEM (or whatever the higher resolution data is) the mosaic operator highest priority.
  2. Set cell size as the same as the LiDAR DEM (or whatever the higher resolution data is).
  3. In environments:
    1. Set the raster analysis to min of inputs cell size.
    2. Use the LiDAR DEM as snap raster

Some useful information and websites

The USGS has a nationwide ~10 meter DEM map available for download for free.

The information is located at the National Elevation Dataset (NED): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/

You can find lots of free information available for various areas across the nation (DEMs, aerials, watersheds, etc.) and if you zoom into your area of interest you can find what information is available. The 10m DEM is referred to as the “1/3 arc-second DEM”. This means that it is approximately 1/3rd of a degree of latitude and longitude. The 1/3rd arc-second equals approximately a 10m DEM (A 10m DEM is a DEM where each pixel is 10 meters by 10 meters), while the 1/9th arc-second DEMs equal approximately a 3m DEM.

You can also find where freely available LiDAR data is located here:
http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/

Thursday, November 03, 2016

Geology Through Literature - Vanity Fair


The next up on my Geology Through Literature thread is Vanity Fair by William Thackeray. Vanity Fair was written in 1848 and follows a group of wealthy urbanites throughout the time period of Napoleon's reemergence from Elba and his eventual defeat at Waterloo. You can get my complete thoughts on the book/story over at my other blog - The Remnant, but for here I will just go into the geological or basic scientific aspects that are brought up in the story.


Chapter XXV

There was only one instance of geology brought up in the story but it was one I had not thought about before.
"Who'd think the moon was two hundred and thirty-six thousand eight hundred and forty-seven miles off?"
This made me question when we actually figured out the distance between the Earth and the Moon. This story was written in 1848 and that seems very early compared to our modern day scientific techniques.

According to Nasa, the Earth is an average of 238,855 miles away, not that far off of the 236,847 miles quoted in the novel. And actually the distance between the Earth and Moon changes depending on the orbit. It goes from 225,623 miles up to 252,088 miles away (Space.com). So in reality, the novels distance quote was spot on. 

The distance from the Earth to the Moon was determined way earlier than the 1800's. In 270 BC, Aristarchus derived the Moon's distances using a lunar eclipse. The Greeks had already known the Earth was a sphere and that the Moon orbited the Earth (since it was assumed everything orbited the Earth at that time). He used this information, along with the duration of one lunar orbit (~a month) and the time it takes to fully cross through the Earth's shadow during an eclipse to determine that the Moon is about 60 Earth's away from the Earth. Without the actual Earth radius though, this couldn't be more refined, until Eratosthenes determine the Earth's circumference a couple of decades later (as discussed earlier). 

More detail on the mathematics of Aristarchus' calculations can be found on Nasa's website: 

Another method was developed by Hipparchus to measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon using a total eclispe of the sun. You can read about his methods here:


References

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Macroevolution - Terms and Linkages


A few years ago, I had taken a class called Macroevolution. During the class we read several seminal papers on the subject and discussed the implications of these topics. At the end of the class, we set up on the white board some of the principle topics in macroevolution. The discussion involved how the topics were linked and specifically what they could be/were linked to. The class ended with a bunch of evolutionary topics that were heavily interacting and influencing each other. 

I though this was fascinating and I ended up taking pictures of the board after we had finished the class. Below is a cleaned up version of that work session with the appropriate terminology defined and/or discussed below. Keep in mind that the interactions depicted in the diagram are not all of the possible interactions, they are just the most prevalent ones that we happened upon during our discussion. 


Macroevolutionary concepts. Click for a larger version.


Terminology
 The descriptions and definitions below are taken or paraphrased directly from the source literature as cited.

Adaptation – Any change in the structure or functioning of successive generations of a population that makes it better suited to its environment. (Oxford Dictionary of Biology)

Burden - Evolutionary constraints caused by functional interdependency and maintained by internal selection or in other words hierarchically nested interdependence of characters within the organism (Schoch, 2010). Basically these are genes that are hard wired into the genome and passed down through generations that are really difficult, if not impossible, to get rid of. For instance, almost all tetrapods have four limbs since the first tetrapod.

Constructional Morphology – Phylogenetic, functional, and morphogenic constraints and their dynamic relationship which help to explain a variety of evolutionary phenomena such as sub-optimal structures, convergence, parallel evolution, channeled evolutionary pathways, and the geometrical patterns that characterize organic structure (Reif et al, 1985).

Deep Homology – the sharing of the genetic regulatory apparatus that is used to build morphologically and phylogenetically disparate animal features. Homology, as classically defined, refers to a historical continuity in which morphological features in related species are similar in pattern or form because they evolved from a corresponding structure in a common ancestor. Deep homology also implies a historical continuity, but in this case the continuity may not be so evident in particular morphologies; it lies in the complex regulatory circuitry inherited from a common ancestor (Shubin et al, 2009).

Developmental Constraint – The theory that during development the systems within an individual organism will develop a limited and discrete subset of phenotypes, regardless of the environmental variance or experimental manipulation. In other words, regularities and trends observed in phylogeny are a reflection of a conserved set of pattern-generating rules. These internal rules of development define the realm of possible variation and place limits on the process of adaptation (Alberch, 1989).

Disparity (Morphological Disparity) – The total amount of the dissimilarities among all and any kinds of biological groups of organisms (Pavlinov, 2011).

Diversity (Taxonomic Diversity, Biodiversity) – The existence of a wide variety of species (species diversity) or other taxa of plants, animals, and microorganisms in a natural community or habitat, or of communities within a particular environment (ecological diversity), or of genetic variation within a species (genetic diversity). The maintenance of a high level of biodiversity is important for the stability of ecosystems (Oxford Dictionary of Biology).

Exaptation – A morphological or physiological character that predisposes an organism to adapt to a changed environment or lifestyle. (Oxford Dictionary of Biology)

Extinction Rate – The number of extinctions during a given period of time.

Gradualism (Phyletic Gradualism) - It holds that new species arise from the slow and steady transformation of entire populations. Under its influence we seek unbroken fossil series linking two forms by insensible gradation as the only complete mirror of Darwinian processes; we ascribe all breaks to imperfections in the record (Eldredge and Gould, 1972).

GRNs (Gene Regulatory Network) – GRNs are large networks that determine the course of animal development. These networks consist largely of the functional linkages among regulatory genes that produce transcription factors and their target cis-regulatory modules in other regulatory genes, together with genes that express spatially important signaling components. They have a modular structure, consisting of assemblies of multigenic subcircuits of various forms. Each such subcircuit performs a distinct regulatory function in the process of development. GRNs have been attributed to being the reason why there is little change in the phylum and superphylum-level body plans since the Early Cambrian (Davidson and Erwin, 2006).

Mass Extinctions – The extinction of a large number of species within a relatively short interval of the geological time scale. (Oxford Dictionary of Biology)

Natural Selection – The process that, according to Darwinism, brings about the evolution of new species of animals and plants. Darwin noted that the size of any population tends to remain constant despite the fact that more offspring are produced than are needed to maintain it. He also saw that variations existed between individuals of the population and concluded that disease, competition, and other forces acting on the population eliminated those individuals less well adapted to their environment. The survivors would pass on any heritable advantageous characteristics to their offspring and in time the composition of the population would change in adaptation to a changing environment. Over a long period of time this process could give rise to organisms so different from the original population that new species are formed. (Oxford Dictionary of Biology)

Punctuated Equilibrium – An evolution hypothesis that states in evolutionary history the development of new species occurs very rapidly in short bursts (lasting typically less than 100,000 years), which are separated by long periods in which little evolutionary change occurs (Oxford Dictionary of Science).

Red Queen Hypothesis – An evolutionary theory that describes how the coevolution of competing species creates a dynamic equilibrium, in which the probability of extinction remains fairly constant over time. Hence, evolution is seen neither as ‘progressive’ – with a species’ chances of survival improving over time – nor as ‘escalatory’ – with increasing vulnerability to extinction over time. Instead, as one species evolves improvements that make it more competitive, its competitors experience selection pressures that force them to evolve in order to keep pace with it. Ones that lag too far behind will become extinct (Oxford Dictionary of Biology).

Rock Record – The availability of the information on the fossil record, which is correlated with the availability of rocks during a particular time period. The absence or presence of rocks, which have the possibility of containing a set of fossils could have an influence on how scientists perceive the evolution of a particular group (evolutionary rate, extinction rate, diversity, etc.) (Barrett et al., 2009).

Signor-Lipps Effect – This effect is where for most organisms, it is unlikely that the true last occurrence of an extinct species or family will be recorded. Therefore, almost all observed time ranges are truncated. This causes a "smearing" of the record of an extinction event backward in time (Raup, 1986). In other words, a fundamental problem with using biostratigraphic last occurrences to infer patterns of extinction is that, barring reworking, last occurrences nearly always underestimate time of extinction. Signor and Lipps (1982) showed that a random distribution of errors at biostratigraphic range end-points can produce apparent gradual decline preceding a sudden extinction boundary (Meldahl, 1990).

Species Selection – Selection is one of two process of origination and persistence of clades that has been proposed. Selection encompasses those interactions between heritable, emergent character variation and the environment that cause differences in rates of birth or death among varying individuals (Vrba and Gould, 1986). Species selection requires that species be units of selection, and thus there must be properties of the species, rather than the sum of the properties of individuals, upon which selection can act (Erwin, 2000).

Species Sorting – Sorting is one of two process of origination and persistence of clades that has been proposed. In Darwinian Theory, evolutionary change is the product of sorting (differential birth and death among varying organisms within a population). Sorting is a simple description of differential representation; it contains, in itself, no statement about causes. As its core, Darwinism provides a theory for the causes of sorting- natural selection acting upon organisms in the “struggle for existence.” However, other processes (genetic drift, for example) produce sorting as well (Vrba and Gould, 1986).

Stasis – An evolutionary theory where there is zero rate of evolution and no extinction of speciation; evolutionary change occurs only in response to changes in the physical environment (Stenseth and Smith, 1984).



References
2008, in Hine, R. S., ed., Oxford Dictionary of Biology: Oxford, Oxford University Press.
2010, in Daintith, J., and Martin, E., eds., Oxford Dictionary of Science: Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Alberch, P., 1989, The logic of monsters: Evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution: Geobios, v. 22, no. Supplement 2, p. 21-57.
Barrett, P. M., McGowan, A. J., and Page, V., 2009, Dinosaur diversity and the rock record: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, v. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0352, p. 1-8.
Davidson, E. H., and Erwin, D. H., 2006, Gene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans: Science, v. 311, no. 5762, p. 796-800.
Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. J., 1972, Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phylogenetic gradualism, in Schopf, T. J. M., ed., Models in Paleobiology: San Francisco, Freeman, Copper and Company, p. 82-115.
Erwin, D. H., 2000, Macroevolution is more than repeated rounds of microevolution: Evolution & Development, v. 2, no. 2, p. 78-84.
Meldahl, K. H., 1990, Sampling, species abundance, and the stratigraphic signature, of mass extinction: A test using Holocene tidal flat molluscs: Geology, v. 18, no. 9, p. 890-893.
Pavlinov, I. Y., 2011, Morphological Disparity: An Attempt to Widen and to Formalize the Concept, INTECH Open Access Publisher.
Raup, D. M., 1986, Biological extinction in earth history: Science, v. 231, no. 4745, p. 1528-1533.
Reif, W.-E., Thomas, R. D. K., and Fischer, M. S., 1985, Constructional morphology: The analysis of constraints in evolution dedicated to A. Seilacher in honour of his 60. birthday: Acta Biotheoretica, v. 34, no. 2, p. 233-248.
Schoch, R. R., 2010, Riedl's burden and the body plan: selection, constraint, and deep time: Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, v. 314B, no. 1, p. 1-10.
Shubin, N., Tabin, C., and Carroll, S., 2009, Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty: Nature, v. 457, no. 7231, p. 818-823.
Signor, P. W., III, and Lipps, J. H., 1982, Sampling bias, gradual extinction patterns and catastrophes in the fossil record Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 190, p. 291-296.
Stenseth, N. C., and Smith, J. M., 1984, Coevolution in Ecosystems: Red Queen Evolution or Stasis?: Evolution, v. 38, no. 4, p. 870-880.
Vrba, E. S., and Gould, S. J., 1986, The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot Be Equated: Paleobiology, v. 12, no. 2, p. 217-228.